Author Charla Viera, MS

The case of Claudine Gay highlights the rising use of AI-driven plagiarism detection tools in academia, prompting researchers to reconsider their citation practices and adapt to evolving standards.

In this article, we will delve into the intricate differences of the types of sources, discuss where to find them, and consider their most advantageous uses.

Among the four top AI proofreading and editing tools compared, Curie stands out as the most suitable and comprehensive tool for academic writing, while other tools may be more appropriate for personal or business use during the drafting phase.

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming academic research and scholarly writing. Ethical concerns persist, with the consensus being that researchers should always disclose AI use in publications. Human oversight is crucial to ensure accuracy and address AI-generated content's limitations.

In this blog, we delve into the process of selecting a resolution that aligns with your research and professional goals. Then, we outline the steps necessary to ensure its successful implementation.

This article explores the impact of AI on libraries and professionals, highlighting how AI can improve information organization, accessibility, user services, and library analytics. It also emphasizes the importance of AI literacy for both librarians and patrons in today's society.

In this AJE blog, we break down the the Nobel Prize winners of 2023, each of whom has made an enduring mark on science, literature, and the quest for global peace.

In an effort to highlight the dangers of censorship, library and First Amendment activist Judith Krug founded Banned Books Week in 1982. Through activities, events, and a slew of resources, the campaign encourages readers to voice their censorship concerns, examine challenged literary works, and celebrate free expression in their communities. 

Workplace censorship, encompassing internal policies, market influences, and internal pressures, can either promote harmony or stifle creativity and open discourse. Critics argue it hampers diversity and equity initiatives by limiting meaningful conversations. Striking a balance between fostering respect and enabling intellectual exploration is essential for a productive and inclusive workplace.